[CAMP-223] 4.2.1 Types "encouraged" -> SHOULD? - OASIS Technical Committees Issue Tracker

XML

Word

Printable

Proposal:

Hide

I would clean up the paragraph to define type, say that details of what is identified by type are not specified and use SHOULD for namespaces.

Show
I would clean up the paragraph to define type, say that details of what is identified by type are not specified and use SHOULD for namespaces.
Resolution:

Hide

This was resolved as not a bug on the 2017-08-31 call https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=61489&wg_abbrev=camp
The TC believes that it is premature to have a SHOULD and best practices are yet to emerge

Show
This was resolved as not a bug on the 2017-08-31 call https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=61489&wg_abbrev=camp The TC believes that it is premature to have a SHOULD and best practices are yet to emerge

4.2.1 in addition to being a disclaimer of what CAMP (this specification?) does not define, contains the following:

"...To promote portability, both providers and consumers of the CAMP API are encouraged to namespace-qualify the types that they use....."

Isn't that a normative SHOULD?