Based on the fact that REST [1] is not a protocol but an architectural style the term "binding" is definitely wrong.

I think we could also choose to call it something more vague with restful in its name.

Generally, I would like to propose that in addition to changing the name throughout the specification we should
also try to adhere to the design principles of AtomPub.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representational_State_Transfer