• Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Major
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: Proposals for 2.0
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Hide

      I propose that we do two things:

      1) ascertain whether there are any strong in principal objections to implementing tagging
      2) if there are no strong objections organise an informal group of representatives to develop a suitable model

      Show
      I propose that we do two things: 1) ascertain whether there are any strong in principal objections to implementing tagging 2) if there are no strong objections organise an informal group of representatives to develop a suitable model
    • Hide

      Deferred to 2.0 (5 March 2012)

      Show
      Deferred to 2.0 (5 March 2012)

      There have been repeated references to the possibility of implementing object/content tagging via one of the proposed new features (e.g. secondary types, or custom objects).

      I can imagine some requirements, including:

      • hierarchical tags
      • facility to relate a tag to an object (i.e. relationship, secondary type or something else)
      • query tags (e.g. top N tags by usage)
      • control security of tags
      • private versus public tags
      • specify some standard tags (e.g. 'My Favorites')
      • tag any object type (including custom objects if implemented)

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            David Churchland (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: