-
Type: Task
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority: Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: V1_WD01
-
Fix Version/s: V1_WD01
-
Component/s: Profile Local Signature
-
Labels:None
-
Proposal:
There is a new revision of the [Web Cryptography API namely the W3C Editor's Draft 12 November 2012](http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/WebCryptoAPI/).
The first Editorial note inside the abstract states:
"""
This is revision $Id: Overview.html,v 1.41 2012/11/12 13:18:15 hhalpin Exp $.
There are 14 further editorial notes in the document.
"""
Especially interesting ones (probably) and in our context of local signature computation (w.r.t. use case chapter) are found in
"""
2. Use Cases (This section is non-normative)
Editorial note
[ACTION-13](https://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/track/actions/13) Add missing use cases.
[ACTION-15](https://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/track/actions/15) Insert in "right place" a description of high-level example
[ACTION-27](https://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/track/actions/27) Add additional primary use cases.
Should these use cases be migrated to the Introduction section, and include non-normative examples of how the API can be used to perform each operation?
"""
The rest beng also interesting like keys on removable media, naming interface of algorithms (dicts only or short cuts) or key life span definable by client etc. but not directly relevant to the currently edited portion of local sig profile work product.