[EMERGENCY-47] Conformance clause is vague -- Issue has been resolved - OASIS Technical Committees Issue Tracker

XML

Word

Printable

Proposal:

Hide

Once there is a meaningful section 4, re-write the conformance clause to reference which general or mandatory requirements are being specified. Be specific.

Show
Once there is a meaningful section 4, re-write the conformance clause to reference which general or mandatory requirements are being specified. Be specific.
Resolution:

Hide

Additional clauses have been added to the Section 5 Conformance to satisfy this issue.

Show
Additional clauses have been added to the Section 5 Conformance to satisfy this issue.

"The conformance clause (Section 5) references Section 4, which itself references a computer generated PDF file that does not follow RFC2119.

Under a) - it isn't possible to determine what ""general requirements"" were intended by the TC.

Under c) ""...meets all the mandatory provisions..."" the failure to follow RFC2119 prevents discovery of the mandatory provisions.
"

Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Hospital AVailability Exchange (HAVE) Version 2.0 CSPRD01