-
Type: Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority: Critical
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
-
Component/s: EDXL-TEP
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:
Normative
-
Proposal:
-
Resolution:
1.4 Terminology reads in part:
-
-
-
-
E.g. [1..1] means REQUIRED, exactly once, [..*] means OPTIONAL, any number of times.
-
-
-
Actually, that's not markup language is it? That's from modeling.
What's wrong with using + one or more, ? optional, and * zero or more, as standard notation? More likely to be read correctly by markup users.
BTW, you do know that your XSD schema controls in the event of a conflict with the standard?
The TC Process document: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#specQuality, under 7(a) provides in part:
-
-
-
-
Where any definition in these separate files disagrees with the definition found in the specification, the definition in the separate file prevails.
-
-
-
So you really don't have to repeat the constraints you have in the schema in any formal way in the prose text. The schema already has that covered.