DE 2.0 No default lists for confidentiality, senderRole, recipientRole?

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major
    • Affects Version/s: csprd01 - Public Review Draft #1
    • Component/s: Schema
    • None
    • Environment:

      Glenn Pearson

    • Hide

      Changes Made: Text Added to SenderRole and RecipientRole
      data dictionary elements to suggest where example roles can be found; also
      modified schema and examples to enable Classified and Unclassified as
      defaults for confidentiality. Members will review this week, approve at
      our next meeting, and close out this issue, subject to any specified
      changes.

      Jeff added ConfidentialityDefault and ConfidentialityValueList to the data dictionary and modified Confidentiality and CombinedConfidentiality to update the data dictionary to show that each now is a choice of a ValueList or a default.

      Reference: 04-24-12-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee Meeting Notes

      Show
      Changes Made: Text Added to SenderRole and RecipientRole data dictionary elements to suggest where example roles can be found; also modified schema and examples to enable Classified and Unclassified as defaults for confidentiality. Members will review this week, approve at our next meeting, and close out this issue, subject to any specified changes. Jeff added ConfidentialityDefault and ConfidentialityValueList to the data dictionary and modified Confidentiality and CombinedConfidentiality to update the data dictionary to show that each now is a choice of a ValueList or a default. Reference: 04-24-12-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee Meeting Notes

      No default lists for confidentiality, senderRole, recipientRole?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Jeff Waters (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: