-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: No Action
-
Affects Version/s: CTSPR01
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: cts
-
Labels:
-
Resolution:
14. The Proposal for Common Transactive Services (CTS) offers no more interoperability (likely less because of flaws) than TEMIX. As a result, CTS is oversold in this Proposal. In addition, the Proposal does not fully implement and is incompatible with the CTS in CTS2016 for reasons described above.
Field | Original Value | New Value |
---|---|---|
Component/s | cts [ 14726 ] | |
Affects Version/s | CTSPR01 [ 17662 ] |
Labels | ARCH-CONF |
Status | New [ 10000 ] | Open [ 1 ] |
Environment | https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202111/msg00001/Cazalet_Comments_on_CTS.pdf Edward G. Cazalet, TEMIX | Edward G. Cazalet, TEMIX https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202111/msg00001/Cazalet_Comments_on_CTS.pdf |
Fix Version/s | ctsWD16 [ 17672 ] | |
Resolution | Fixed [ 1 ] | |
Status | Open [ 1 ] | Resolved [ 5 ] |
Resolution |
CTS2016 was proposed outside a standards process. As open source implementations evolved, CTS evolved to address integration with financial markets and limit complexity, while maintaining consistency with current software engineering and architecture principles.
In short, CTS 2016 was not a standard, and compatibility with an informal specification is atypical. |
Status | Resolved [ 5 ] | Open [ 1 ] |
Fix Version/s | ctsWD16 [ 17672 ] | |
Resolution | Fixed [ 1 ] | No Action [ 8 ] |
Status | Open [ 1 ] | Resolved [ 5 ] |
Status | Resolved [ 5 ] | Applied [ 10002 ] |
Status | Applied [ 10002 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
CTS2016 was proposed outside a standards process. As open source implementations evolved, CTS evolved to address integration with financial markets and limit complexity, while maintaining consistency with current software engineering and architecture principles.
Include text on this history.