-
Type:
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Priority:
Minor
-
Affects Version/s: IMI 1.0 PR1
-
Component/s: Editorial
-
None
From public comment: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi-comment/200904/msg00001.html
Section 2.3 is much less clear then the rest of the document.
lines 383-385 say:
When following a chain of STSs, when an STS with an ic:RequireFederatedIdentityProvisioning declaration is
encountered as per Section 3.2.1, this informs the Identity Selector that the STS is an IP/STS, rather than a
member of the RP/STS chain.
It is not clear what this means or what its significance is. If the intent is that the IP/STS marks the end of the chain, why not say so?