Need for more specificity in issuer language for SAML 2.0 token profile

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Bug
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Minor
    • SAML 2.0 Profile PR
    • Affects Version/s: SAML 2.0 Profile PR
    • Component/s: Spec
    • None
    • Hide

      Change the language to:
      When identifying a requirement for a specific token issuer, the Relying Party SHOULD use the Identity Provider's unique name (i.e., its "entityID") either as the value of the sp:Issuer/wsa:Address element in its security policy or as the value of the issuer object tag parameter.

      Show
      Change the language to: When identifying a requirement for a specific token issuer, the Relying Party SHOULD use the Identity Provider's unique name (i.e., its "entityID") either as the value of the sp:Issuer/wsa:Address element in its security policy or as the value of the issuer object tag parameter.

      The section on relying parties identifying token issuers currently says:
      When identifying a requirement for a specific token issuer, the relying party SHOULD use the identity provider's unique name (i.e., its "entityID").

      This doesn't specify which protocol elements are being referred to.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Michael Jones (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: