• Type: Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Minor
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: 3.1.1
    • Component/s: edits
    • None
    • Environment:

      Grammar

    • Hide

      Replace "SHALL NOT" with "MUST NOT"

      Show
      Replace "SHALL NOT" with "MUST NOT"
    • Hide

      Resolved in WD19

      Show
      Resolved in WD19

      7 Conformance reads in part:

      *****
      Conformant implementations SHALL NOT require the use of any extensions
      *****

      Curious why you shifted to using SHALL NOT here when elsewhere you used MUST NOT?

      Both are valid under RFC2119 but to be consistent, you may want to consider using "MUST NOT" here. (Depends on what you do with the rest of the conformance clause. More comments coming.)

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Patrick Durusau
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: