-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: V4.0_WD01
-
Fix Version/s: V4.0_WD01
-
Component/s: ATOM Format
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:
[Proposed]
-
Proposal:
-
Resolution:
Section 9 "Custom Mapping to Atom Elements" mentions that property values may be mapped to predefined atom elements or custom content within an entry. It then refers to CSDL, which also doesn't define this mapping.
Field | Original Value | New Value |
---|---|---|
Resolution | Remove references to ATOM mapping in Section 9 and throughout. | |
Environment | [Proposed] |
Proposal |
Remove the dangling reference Accepted: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/48269/odata-meeting-25_on-20130214-minutes.html#odata-202 |
|
Status | New [ 10000 ] | Open [ 1 ] |
Resolution | Fixed [ 1 ] | |
Status | Open [ 1 ] | Resolved [ 5 ] |
Assignee | Ralf Handl [ ralfhandl ] |
Resolution | Remove references to ATOM mapping in Section 9 and throughout. | https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/48275/odata-atom-format-v4.0-wd01-2013-02-15-RH.doc |
Status | Resolved [ 5 ] | Applied [ 10002 ] |
Reporter | Ralf Handl [ ralfhandl ] | Ralf Handl [ handl ] |
Assignee | Ralf Handl [ ralfhandl ] | Ralf Handl [ handl ] |
I would rather not add a format-specific mapping to CSDL. Instead, if the committee feels it would be valuable, I would suggest defining an atom-specific vocabulary for specifying such a mapping.