Details

      Description

      This is a spin-off to OFFICE-1148 to make it easier to track the change.

      The proposal
      https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/email/archives/201806/msg00047/OFFICE-1148_RegressionCurveFileFormat_new_moving_average.odt
      from mail https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/email/archives/201806/msg00047.html was accepted in ODF TC call 2018-06-11.

      But it is not yet in working-drafts for ODF 1.3

        Attachments

          Activity

          Hide
          patrick Patrick Durusau added a comment -

          as of 25 June 2018 - to correct oversight

          Show
          patrick Patrick Durusau added a comment - as of 25 June 2018 - to correct oversight
          Hide
          patrick Patrick Durusau added a comment -

          Applied in OpenDocument-v1.3-wd13-03-part3-documents.odt

          Show
          patrick Patrick Durusau added a comment - Applied in OpenDocument-v1.3-wd13-03-part3-documents.odt
          Hide
          michaelst Michael Stahl [X] (Inactive) added a comment -

          Editors: firstly, the schema changes are missing from the latest schema.

          secondly, in 20.47 chart:regression-moving-type there is a formatting issue:

          the attribute values "prior", "central", "averaged-abscissa" should be unnumbered list items (there isn't even a paragraph break between the first two)

          oh, another issue: is it "abscissa" or "abscizza" ? i believe "abscissa" is correct; the offending "abscizza" is in the first paragraph: "The defined values for the chart:regression-moving-type attribute are: prior, central and averaged-abscizza."

          Show
          michaelst Michael Stahl [X] (Inactive) added a comment - Editors: firstly, the schema changes are missing from the latest schema. secondly, in 20.47 chart:regression-moving-type there is a formatting issue: the attribute values "prior", "central", "averaged-abscissa" should be unnumbered list items (there isn't even a paragraph break between the first two) oh, another issue: is it "abscissa" or "abscizza" ? i believe "abscissa" is correct; the offending "abscizza" is in the first paragraph: "The defined values for the chart:regression-moving-type attribute are: prior, central and averaged-abscizza."
          Hide
          patrick Patrick Durusau added a comment -

          Applied in OpenDocument-v1.3-wd16-part3-documents.odt - bulleted formatting for values, abscizza -> abscissa, Michael has already corrected the schema omission (thanks Michael)

          Show
          patrick Patrick Durusau added a comment - Applied in OpenDocument-v1.3-wd16-part3-documents.odt - bulleted formatting for values, abscizza -> abscissa, Michael has already corrected the schema omission (thanks Michael)
          Hide
          michaelst Michael Stahl [X] (Inactive) added a comment -

          this one is not fixed in wd16; i mean the paragraphs with the formulas (3rd/4th from the bottom)

          "the attribute values "prior", "central", "averaged-abscissa" should be unnumbered list items (there isn't even a paragraph break between the first two)"

          Show
          michaelst Michael Stahl [X] (Inactive) added a comment - this one is not fixed in wd16; i mean the paragraphs with the formulas (3rd/4th from the bottom) "the attribute values "prior", "central", "averaged-abscissa" should be unnumbered list items (there isn't even a paragraph break between the first two)"
          Hide
          patrick Patrick Durusau added a comment -

          Applied in OpenDocument-1.3-wd17-part3-documents.odt

          Show
          patrick Patrick Durusau added a comment - Applied in OpenDocument-1.3-wd17-part3-documents.odt

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              regina.henschel Regina Henschel
            • Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: