-
Type: Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority: Minor
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Proposal:
The OSLC Core 3.0 vocabulary includes the terms defined in the Vocabulary Annotation Vocabulary (an addendum at http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Vocabulary-Annotation-Vocabulary/) from OSLC 2.0 days - though these terms were not published as part of OSLC 2.0 Core.
However, two of the terms proposed for impact analysis have misleading names, and very misleading descriptions in the proposed Core 3.0 vocabulary:
<http://open-services.net/ns/core#UpstreamImpact>
rdfs:comment "Subject resources, indicated by triples of the subject property, have an upstream impact from the object resource." ;
Impact is always felt downstream, as per the definition of these terms as described at http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Vocabulary-Annotation-Vocabulary/. What this term is trying to describe is that the link is pointing upstream, and so impact analysis should consider impact to flow in the opposite direction of the link. For this reason, both the original name and the 3.0 description are misleading.