-
Type: Task
-
Status: Resolved
-
Priority: Major
-
Resolution: Applied
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Proposal:
-
Resolution:
Are clients and servers expected to reflectively support both versions with no compatibility implied between them? This appears to be the current compatibility approach and guidance.
What is the recommendation for OSLC 2.0 capabilities not yet included in OSLC 3.0 - avoid them, implement them on a 3.0 server? Do we even know if that’s possible? Use a 2.0/3.0 hybrid server? Will vendors be willing to implement that? Is it practical?
Given a recommendation, what are the possible incompatibilities that might need to be discovered and addressed in the current OSLC 3.0 specifications?