• Type: Task
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Major
    • None
    • Hide

      Dave thinks the scoping aspect is, or should be, captured in the instance and not in the catalogue. A Syndrome that linked two elements should include a signature term that linked the subjects of the two syndrome instances. This exists in the model currently, so I don't think this need to be an issue.
      Updates from Nov 12: Covered by subject & reporter for Symptom, but no "subject" for Prescription. Furthermore, we might consider adding this to the Syndrome, so as to understand what subjects are possibly affected by prescriptions.

      Show
      Dave thinks the scoping aspect is, or should be, captured in the instance and not in the catalogue. A Syndrome that linked two elements should include a signature term that linked the subjects of the two syndrome instances. This exists in the model currently, so I don't think this need to be an issue. Updates from Nov 12: Covered by subject & reporter for Symptom, but no "subject" for Prescription. Furthermore, we might consider adding this to the Syndrome, so as to understand what subjects are possibly affected by prescriptions.

      Should we have Scope as 1st class attribute of Symptoms and Syndromes? (in the definition, as opposed to the instance).

            Assignee:
            Jeffrey Vaught (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Jeffrey Vaught (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: