Uploaded image for project: 'Technical Advisory Board'
  1. Technical Advisory Board
  2. TAB-1633

Conflict on extensions: SHALL NOT versus organization-specific profiles

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: New
    • Priority: Blocker
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: Open Command and Control (OpenC2) Language Specification Version 1.0
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:

      Technical

    • Proposal:
      Hide

      Truth is all schemas are subject to extension and you should write this and your conformance language to specify conforming extensions. 

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      Show
      Truth is all schemas are subject to extension and you should write this and your conformance language to specify conforming extensions.                   

      Description

      It's not easy making the rules. On one hand, 3.3.3 says: "The list of ACTIONS in Section 3.2.1.2 SHALL NOT be extended." but, then 3.3.4 says: "Organizations may extend the functionality of OpenC2 by defining organization-specific profiles."

      You go onto say: "OpenC2 defines two methods for defining organization-specific profiles: using a registered namespace or an unregistered namespace." 

      The first sentence enables an organization to define its own profile, the second sentence says OpenC2 has also defined two ways to extend. So, the limitation on defining more ACTIONS does not apply to the first case.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              patrick Patrick Durusau
            • Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated: