Details

    • Type: New Feature
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:

      Description

      I would like to discuss the opportunity / challenges to create an alternate representation for UBL in RDF

        Attachments

          Activity

          cecilesunsiare.guasch Cecile Guasch created issue -
          gkholman Ken Holman (Inactive) made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Status New [ 10000 ] Open [ 1 ]
          Hide
          gkholman Ken Holman (Inactive) added a comment -

          Even though this is not part of the normative deliverable for UBL, it makes sense to talk about it now so that we can plan ahead for its use.

          Has there been demand from others regarding needing an RDF representation of UBL? If so, is it for the UBL model or for an instance of UBL (I'm guessing the latter)?

          What would a snippet of the RDF look like? I have never used RDF except for my corporate web site resource feeds. I don't understand it enough to know what it means to have an alternative representation of UBL in RDF.

          Show
          gkholman Ken Holman (Inactive) added a comment - Even though this is not part of the normative deliverable for UBL, it makes sense to talk about it now so that we can plan ahead for its use. Has there been demand from others regarding needing an RDF representation of UBL? If so, is it for the UBL model or for an instance of UBL (I'm guessing the latter)? What would a snippet of the RDF look like? I have never used RDF except for my corporate web site resource feeds. I don't understand it enough to know what it means to have an alternative representation of UBL in RDF.
          Hide
          gkholman Ken Holman (Inactive) added a comment -

          Per https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201905/msg00033.html it was decided this would be deferred as a separate committee note and not part of the UBL 2.3 release.

          Show
          gkholman Ken Holman (Inactive) added a comment - Per https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201905/msg00033.html  it was decided this would be deferred as a separate committee note and not part of the UBL 2.3 release.
          gkholman Ken Holman (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Open [ 1 ] Deferred [ 10001 ]
          Hide
          kenneth.bengtsson Kenneth Bengtsson added a comment -

          Agreed at TC meeting May 19 2021 to defer this until we have a demand and a champion.

          Show
          kenneth.bengtsson Kenneth Bengtsson added a comment - Agreed at TC meeting May 19 2021 to defer this until we have a demand and a champion.
          KBengtsson2 Kenneth Bengtsson made changes -
          Labels 2.5-discussion
          Status Deferred [ 10001 ] Open [ 1 ]

            People

            • Assignee:
              gkholman Ken Holman (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              cecilesunsiare.guasch Cecile Guasch
            • Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated: