OASIS XRI Data Interchange (XDI) TCIcon indicating the project type

OASIS XRI Data Interchange (XDI) TC

Uploaded image for project: 'OASIS XRI Data Interchange (XDI) TC'
  1. OASIS XRI Data Interchange (XDI) TC
  2. XDI-29

Versioning of XDI graph

    Details

    • Type: New Feature
    • Status: New
    • Priority: Critical
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: 1.0
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: XDI Core
    • Labels:

      Description

      Following a conversation about the notation shift, we need to discuss the need to support XDI-graph versioning.
      There is a version defined at the Messaging level but it is probably preferable to have a separate one for XDI graph definitions.

        Attachments

          Activity

          Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
          Hide
          Permalink
          hubert_levangong Hubert Le Van Gong (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          To be clear, I'm talking about the versioning of the XDI standard, not versioning of data (e.g. collection).
          For instance to differentiate pre and post notation shift XDI standard.

          Show
          hubert_levangong Hubert Le Van Gong (Inactive) added a comment - - edited To be clear, I'm talking about the versioning of the XDI standard, not versioning of data (e.g. collection). For instance to differentiate pre and post notation shift XDI standard.
          Hide
          Permalink
          joseph Joseph Boyle (Inactive) added a comment -

          Pre-1.0 versions of the standard are identified by working draft number.

          Show
          joseph Joseph Boyle (Inactive) added a comment - Pre-1.0 versions of the standard are identified by working draft number.
          Hide
          Permalink
          hubert_levangong Hubert Le Van Gong (Inactive) added a comment -

          We still need to add versioning starting 1.0 (to prepare for subsequent releases).

          BTW how do we expect 2 implementations that use different pre-1.0 versions to interoperate...?

          Show
          hubert_levangong Hubert Le Van Gong (Inactive) added a comment - We still need to add versioning starting 1.0 (to prepare for subsequent releases). BTW how do we expect 2 implementations that use different pre-1.0 versions to interoperate...?
          Hide
          Permalink
          joseph Joseph Boyle (Inactive) added a comment -

          We've discussed this in TC meeting - if we can avoid having to support pre-1.0 versions that would be better.

          In any case I don't think this is a bug against the spec - it may be for XDI itself.

          Show
          joseph Joseph Boyle (Inactive) added a comment - We've discussed this in TC meeting - if we can avoid having to support pre-1.0 versions that would be better. In any case I don't think this is a bug against the spec - it may be for XDI itself.
          Hide
          Permalink
          hubert_levangong Hubert Le Van Gong (Inactive) added a comment -

          Isn't this a bug for 1.0 though?
          In other words, aren't we going to address graph versioning in 1.0?

          Show
          hubert_levangong Hubert Le Van Gong (Inactive) added a comment - Isn't this a bug for 1.0 though? In other words, aren't we going to address graph versioning in 1.0?
          Hide
          Permalink
          peter.davis Peter Davis (Inactive) added a comment -

          ED: to clarify the comment a bit, "We need a mechanism to express the version of the serialization and XDI graph model. I would expect this to have an initial value of 1.0". See proposed resolution in https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xdi/201407/msg00107.html

          Agree that Core should include details on how Graph and serialization version is expressed.

          Messaging will need additional material (esp. wrt messaging versions)

          Show
          peter.davis Peter Davis (Inactive) added a comment - ED: to clarify the comment a bit, "We need a mechanism to express the version of the serialization and XDI graph model. I would expect this to have an initial value of 1.0". See proposed resolution in https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xdi/201407/msg00107.html Agree that Core should include details on how Graph and serialization version is expressed. Messaging will need additional material (esp. wrt messaging versions)

            People

            • Assignee:
              peacekeeper Markus Sabadello (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              hubert_levangong Hubert Le Van Gong (Inactive)
            • Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated: