Details

    • Proposal:
      Hide

      Add the urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:itsm:2.1 where
      it's missing in the prose descriptions of the extension points. E.g. file,
      group, unit, mrk, sm, match..

      Show
      Add the urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:itsm:2.1 where it's missing in the prose descriptions of the extension points. E.g. file, group, unit, mrk, sm, match..
    • Resolution:
      Hide

      Consensus to fix as Proposed in the meeting of 21st Feb, 2017

      Show
      Consensus to fix as Proposed in the meeting of 21st Feb, 2017

      Description

      Missing itsm namespace on core extension points prose

      Hi all, I noticed that the core and module extension points prose
      descriptions list
      only https://www.w3.org/2005/11/its/
      as the explicitly allowed ITS Module namespace.
      Since the ITS Module is now using both the its and the itsm namespaces,
      also the urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:itsm:2.1
      namespace needs listed.
      1. Since both namespaces have their xsd among the currently reviewed
      validation artifacts and
      2. both namespaces are also used for validation from the current Schematron
      schemas and since
      3. according to OASIS policy machine readable artifacts have precedence
      over prose in case of conflicts,
      [ergo]--------------------------------
      4. fixing this omission can be deemed editorial in nature.

      Hereby I propose that the urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:itsm:2.1 is added where
      it's missing in the prose descriptions of the extension points. E.g. file,
      group, unit, mrk, sm, match..

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              DavidFilip David Filip
              Reporter:
              DavidFilip David Filip
            • Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Due:
                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: