• Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Minor
    • WD02
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • None

      From Steve Huston's comments:

      Part 2, section 6.12, 2nd para: mentions message state, but that hasn't
      been defined and isn't nearby - what is it?

      PROPOSED FIX: Change "its" to "the delivery's"

      Part 2, section 6.12, 6th para: How can a message spontaneously attain a
      terminal state?

      PROPOSED FIX: add (e.g., through the expiry of TTL at the sender)

      Part 2, section 6.12, 10th para, 2nd sentence: "In this case the Sender
      should send..." - should "should" be "MUST" and "but not settle" be "and
      MUST NOT settle"?

      PROPOSED FIX: Make clearer the transition from normative definition to narrative example (somewhere near the start of 6.12)
      Part 2, section 6.7 and section 7.4, delivery-count: It would be helpful
      to explicitly state what is included in this count.

            Assignee:
            Rafael Schloming (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            David Ingham (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: