C.1 Mandatory Statements

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Bug
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Minor
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Public Review
    • None
    • Hide

      Add a short introductory paragraph above tables in appendix C explaining that these statements are Normative requirements that are included in the body of the specification:

      C1:
      The following table is a cross-index of the mandatory, normative statements (i.e. statements containing the keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", or "SHALL") that appear in the body of the specification. This table is provided for convenience. See these statements in context for a complete understanding of each.

      C2:
      The following table is a cross-index of non-mandatory, normative statements (i.e. statements containing the keywords "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", or "OPTIONAL") that appear in the body of the specification. This table is provided for convenience. See these statements in context for a complete understanding of each.

      Show
      Add a short introductory paragraph above tables in appendix C explaining that these statements are Normative requirements that are included in the body of the specification: C1: The following table is a cross-index of the mandatory, normative statements (i.e. statements containing the keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", or "SHALL") that appear in the body of the specification. This table is provided for convenience. See these statements in context for a complete understanding of each. C2: The following table is a cross-index of non-mandatory, normative statements (i.e. statements containing the keywords "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", or "OPTIONAL") that appear in the body of the specification. This table is provided for convenience. See these statements in context for a complete understanding of each.
    • Hide

      Close no action see CAMP-99

      Show
      Close no action see CAMP-99

      The conformance sections, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, refer to this table for conformance requirements for Providers, Consumers, and PDP.

      However, the identification system, CO-, PDP-, RE-, PR-, EX-, with the possible exception of PDP, have no obvious relationship to the implementations that may be seeking to conform. In some cases, use of Provider/Consumer provides a clue but for example: PR-29:

      The media types associated with the various formats SHALL be as follows:
      ZIP: "application/x-zip"

      without more context, isn't attributable to any particular conforming implementation. I would assume at least Providers and Consumers but that's a guess on my part. Probably a good one but standards readers should not have to guess.

            Assignee:
            Jacques Durand (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Gilbert Pilz (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: