Uploaded image for project: 'OASIS Cloud Application Management for Platforms (CAMP) TC'
  1. OASIS Cloud Application Management for Platforms (CAMP) TC
  2. CAMP-166

CLONE - Response to call for comments: "application packag", "_uri", and "DP example"

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: SPEC PR2
    • Labels:
      None
    • Proposal:
      Hide

      Close no action. The current model expects a uri and therefore the type cannot be widened without a redesign to make it extensible.Need more implementation experience to see if an extensible mechanism would be useful.

      Show
      Close no action. The current model expects a uri and therefore the type cannot be widened without a redesign to make it extensible.Need more implementation experience to see if an extensible mechanism would be useful.
    • Resolution:
      Hide

      Close no action

      From 19th March 2014:

      MOTION: m/Gil s/Adrian Close CAMP-166 with no action.
      Discussion: the type of the value of an attribute must not be changed
      Motion carried by UC.

      Show
      Close no action From 19th March 2014: MOTION: m/Gil s/Adrian Close CAMP-166 with no action. Discussion: the type of the value of an attribute must not be changed Motion carried by UC.

      Description

      https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/camp-comment/201403/msg00000.html

      2. Do the property names need "_uri" on the end? By putting that on, you prevent using the same property name in future for an inlined version of the linked resource (if a future spec version allows it, e.g. to allow the reduction of HTTP requests needed to get certain information/resources). A property named "operations" on an assembly resource (as indeed the arrow is labelled in the 2nd diagram in section 2.2.6) would have exactly the same semantics as a property named "operations_uri", when the value is a string containing a URI. The advantage of the former would be the possible widening of the allowed value type in future, as mentioned just now, where the value would be a JSON object rather than a string.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              martin.chapman Martin Chapman (Inactive)
            • Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated: