-
Type: Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority: Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: Spec
-
Labels:None
-
Proposal:
The spec talks about basic auth requirement:
"Each request will be authenticated using HTTP Basic Authentication [RFC2617] unless otherwise noted."
(Above, what does "will" mean, is it intended to be a MUST?)
Unless I missed it somewhere reading the spec, looks like it does not talk about other authentication/authorization mechanism such as OAuth2. OAuth2 is still a draft but in practice its implemented/used by many. For example, if a "application developer", might be able to use OAuth2 access token[1] as HTTP Authentication header[2] or in some cases as URI query parameter while calling a vendor's CAMP APIs.
It sounds like the spec intends to mandate basic auth as the only authentication mechanism. Perhaps it should allow OAuth2 or other authorization/authentication mechanism as extensibility or keep it open and adopt OAuth2 as it evolves during spec development.
[1]http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-27#section-7
[2]http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-19