Should CAMP surface the names of the application states?

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Minor
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Spec
    • None
    • Hide

      close no action as we have no standard operation names. re-visit after some interop experience

      Show
      close no action as we have no standard operation names. re-visit after some interop experience

      The application lifecycle model uses names like deployed, stopped, etc should these be normative?

      This was discussed at the Nov 12 F2F where we agreed on the new issue and to open it.

            Assignee:
            Gilbert Pilz (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Martin Chapman (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: