• Type: Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Public Review
    • None
    • Hide

      Close No Action:

      #1 we agreed to not have a generic "security considerations" section. We have addressed transport security and plan integrity

      #2 has been resolved by CAMP-149

      Reply #3 is out of scope for this specification.

      Show
      Close No Action: #1 we agreed to not have a generic "security considerations" section. We have addressed transport security and plan integrity #2 has been resolved by CAMP-149 Reply #3 is out of scope for this specification.

      The Open Data Center Alliance has submitted the following comments: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/camp-comment/201309/msg00009.html

      1) We could not determine where the security dimension is adequately addressed, protecting interactions by means of the API's, and securing data transmitted via the API's
      2) Better positioning may be valuable as to whether these API's are meant to support application module inter-operability within a total system, or complete PaaS model Orchestration and Operation from a management perspective
      3) How do the functionality of theses interfaces benchmark against existing well defined PaaS provider solutions like Amazon, Google etc - are they sufficiently complete that functionality would not be lost?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Gilbert Pilz (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: