Patrick Durusau submitted the following PR comment (https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/camp-comment/201309/msg00016.html):

Section 1.6 has the usual RFC2119 language and then continues to
define or at least refer to conformance targets for the specification.

The reference to conformance targets is confusing. It appears to be an
alternate definition of conformance targets.

Better to create a section: CAMP Terminology and then have a bulleted
list that reports definitions, thus:

*****
Camp Provider (Provider) - An implementation of a server as defined in
(Section Reference).

Camp Consumer (Consumer) - An implementation of a client as defined in
(Section Reference).

Platform Deployment Package (PDP) - Format of a deployment plan as
defined in (Section Reference).
*****

This also resolves the difference in "for short" and its omission in
the last entry.