Patrick Durusau submitted the following PR comment (https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/camp-comment/201309/msg00022.html):

Under Figure 2-2 CAMP Resources as UML Classes, I read the following
paragraphs:

*****
Figure 2-2 is a UML Class Diagram showing the CAMP resources as UML
classes. All CAMP resources share a set of common attributes shown
here as a CampResource parent class.

Each attribute shown in these UML class diagrams has a CAMP common
type. The '+' symbol before each attribute name in the boxes indicates
that the attribute access is public (i.e. available thru the API).
Non-mandatory resource attributes are indicated using the [0..1] UML
multiplicity tag.
*****

Two questions:

1) Are figures normative? (general to all UML figures)

2) If figures/UML are normative, if there is a conflict between the
UML and the normative prose of the text, which controls? (general to
all UML figures)