-
Type:
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Priority:
Major
-
None
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Component/s: Public Review
-
None
Patrick Durusau submitted the following PR comment (https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/camp-comment/201309/msg00035.html):
The paragraphs immediately following 3 Application Management
Lifecycle read:
*****
The figures in this section are UML object instance diagrams, which
represent related Resource instances at various stages of Platform
Resource instantiation. For simplification, attributes for these
resources are not shown. For a comprehensive list of attributes for
resources see Section 5, "Resources".
Instances in these diagrams are indicated by boxes, with an underlined
"object-name: Class" label. Relationships visible thru the API are
shown using associations with navigation arrows. Implementation
specific relationships are indicated using the association end
notation, without navigation arrows.
*****
1) As it is unclear whether Section 3 is normative or not (subject of
a separate comment), these hanging paragraphs will make it difficult
to separate them from the rest of Section 3, should some of it prove
to be normative.
2) What is the relationship between this UML diagram explanation and
the one following figure 2-6?
Perhaps consolidation of all UML diagram explanations in Section 2
would give a reader all the information they need?
Doesn't seem to really "fit" here when discussing Application
Management Lifecycle.