Paging support in AtomPub Binding using rfc5005 is redundant

    • Type: Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: REST/AtomPub Binding
    • None
    • Hide

      Omit the reference to rfc5005.

      Show
      Omit the reference to rfc5005.
    • Hide

      Removed rfc5005

      Show
      Removed rfc5005

      Atom was released in Dec 2005, rfc5005 in Sep 2007 and AtomPub in Oct 2007. It appears that AtomPub gives us nearly everything that rfc5005 does, minus the <fh:complete/> schema extension. We get that same behavior by excluding the paging links on the response for a collection. That exclusion indicates a complete feed. Do we need rfc5005? AtomPub appears to give us what's needed here.

      The relevant section from AtomPub (rfc5023) is 10.1.

            Assignee:
            Al Brown (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Ryan McVeigh (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: