discussion of social features

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: New Feature
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Minor
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: Proposals for 2.0
    • Component/s: Domain Model
    • None
    • Hide

      Add social data about documents to the domain model.

      • comments
      • tags
      • recommendations
      • ratings
      • statistics ("most commented", "most downloaded", etc.)
        -???

      Alternatively we could issue a recommendation for modeling social features using the existing domain model.

      There are pros and cons to each approach. I'd like to discuss both.

      Show
      Add social data about documents to the domain model. comments tags recommendations ratings statistics ("most commented", "most downloaded", etc.) -??? Alternatively we could issue a recommendation for modeling social features using the existing domain model. There are pros and cons to each approach. I'd like to discuss both.

      Placeholder for discussion about the introduction of social features into the specification.

      We can loosely define "social features" to mean metadata that is informally created and managed by end users in order to quickly categorize, find and share content.
      Comments, tags, recommendations and/or ratings, statistics ("most commented", "most downloaded", etc.) all fall into this category. All are document-centric; we would not add a general forums feature to the spec, only comments linked to documents.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Scott Malabarba (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: