Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 1.2_CSD01_WD01
    • Fix Version/s: 1.2_CS01_WD01
    • Component/s: CSAF_CVRF
    • Labels:
    • Environment:

      [Proposed]

    • Proposal:
      Hide
      • Correct Typo on 2.2.3.7 – “The value Produzct Name of Branch Type indicates the name of the product.”
      • Correct Syntax: The plural of Product ID is “Product IDs”, not the possessive form “Product ID’s” (2.2.4.n)
      • Correct Syntax: Remove the “:” from the end of 2.2.5.4 Product Tree Model – Grouped:
      • Corrected Semantics conveyed: The non-normative comment for [CSAF-2.215-1] should read: “The two *vulnerability involvement* status states, ….” Reason: since presumably Completed and Disputed are also a final status state based on the statement that open or in-progress documents should eventually be issued as Disputed or Completed. (Note: deletion of word "final")
      • Correct Syntax: The plural forms of OID and MIB are “OIDs” and “MIBs” respectively, not the possessive form “OID’s” and “MIB’s” (4.4 Document Publisher).
      • Correct Formatting of indent for vuln:Notes on page 59
      Show
      Correct Typo on 2.2.3.7 – “The value Produzct Name of Branch Type indicates the name of the product.” Correct Syntax: The plural of Product ID is “Product IDs”, not the possessive form “Product ID’s” (2.2.4.n) Correct Syntax: Remove the “:” from the end of 2.2.5.4 Product Tree Model – Grouped: Corrected Semantics conveyed: The non-normative comment for [CSAF-2.215-1] should read: “The two * vulnerability involvement * status states, ….” Reason: since presumably Completed and Disputed are also a final status state based on the statement that open or in-progress documents should eventually be issued as Disputed or Completed. (Note: deletion of word "final") Correct Syntax: The plural forms of OID and MIB are “OIDs” and “MIBs” respectively, not the possessive form “OID’s” and “MIB’s” (4.4 Document Publisher). Correct Formatting of indent for vuln:Notes on page 59
    • Resolution:
      Hide

      [purely editorial]

      Show
      [purely editorial]

      Description

      We received one TC internal comment with purely editorial content ("no technical corrections/comments") from Beth Pumo ( https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/csaf/201707/msg00003.html ) that the editor intents to implement as non-material changes revision as candidate for balloting and further progression in the OASIS standards creation process.

      """
      Copied from mail:
      We have no technical corrections/comments but we do have a few minor updates:

      • Typo on 2.2.3.7 – “The value Produzct Name of Branch Type indicates the name of the product.”
      • Syntax: The plural of Product ID is “Product IDs”, not the possessive form “Product ID’s” (2.2.4.n)
      • Syntax: Remove the “:” from the end of 2.2.5.4 Product Tree Model – Grouped:
      • Semantics: The non-normative comment for [CSAF-2.215-1] should read: “The final two *vulnerability involvement* status states, ….” Reason: since presumably Completed and Disputed are also a final status state based on the statement that open or in-progress documents should eventually be issued as Disputed or Completed.
      • Syntax: The plural forms of OID and MIB are “OIDs” and “MIBs” respectively, not the possessive form “OID’s” and “MIB’s” (4.4 Document Publisher).
      • Formatting of indent for vuln:Notes on page 59

      """

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              santosomar Omar Santos
              Reporter:
              sdrees Stefan Hagen
            • Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Due:
                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: