• Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Major
    • Component/s: EDXL-CAP
    • Hide

      A motion, to approve the change in Emergency-145 “Remove paragraph from 2.6”, was put forward by Elysa and seconded by Norm. The motion was approved with all in favour.

      Minuted in CAP SC: Aug13-2021-meeting-notes

      Show
      A motion, to approve the change in Emergency-145 “Remove paragraph from 2.6”, was put forward by Elysa and seconded by Norm. The motion was approved with all in favour. Minuted in CAP SC: Aug13-2021-meeting-notes

      Remove this paragraph from 2.6 as its not relevant.

       

      Regardless of what event terms are already in use, and what they might truly signify, the overall social aspect of an alerting service has been established. Furthermore, for this exampled case, it should be pointed out that the alert terms “emergency” and “warning” are not uncommon variations for the choice of term for an “alert”, or is it actually meant to be a “bushfire emergency alert” of type “bushfire emergency”. Nevertheless, the conclusion is that the practice of using terms for naming events and alerts can vary considerably making comparisons difficult.

            Assignee:
            rexbrooks
            Reporter:
            Jacob Westfall (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: