IRC Comments on PR04 - 2 of 3 - Eliminate Reserves as Options

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Sub-task
    • Resolution: No Action
    • Priority: Major
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: CSD04/PR04
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Environment:

      IRC Comments on PR04

    • Hide

      Close no action. The technical committee has previously voted and approved a similar resolution on Public Reviews 1, 2, and 3 (cf. Issues EMIX-220 , EMIX -463, EMIX-484.) The approved (by roll call vote) resolution that led to Public Review 04 is EMIX-484 where the resolution was

      "Create new AncillaryServices type and section, using IRC product names as listed in the NAESB PAP03 Requirements."

      Show
      Close no action. The technical committee has previously voted and approved a similar resolution on Public Reviews 1, 2, and 3 (cf. Issues EMIX-220 , EMIX -463, EMIX-484 .) The approved (by roll call vote) resolution that led to Public Review 04 is EMIX-484 where the resolution was "Create new AncillaryServices type and section, using IRC product names as listed in the NAESB PAP03 Requirements."

      See http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/emix/201110/biny4XYpHXoFG.bin for .xlsx spreadsheet.

      Reserves as Options The IRC does not see the benefit of re-phrasing widely understood concepts for reserves. See the NAESB, CIM and IRC submitted work where reserves are products not options.

            Assignee:
            William Cox (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            William Cox (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: