Uploaded image for project: 'OASIS Energy Interoperation TC'
  1. OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
  2. ENERGYINTEROP-379

Use of "Type" in the naming convention

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: wd22
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: schema
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:

      Gerald Gray

    • Proposal:
      Hide

      Remove the word "type" unless it is being used to distinguish amongst a class.

      Show
      Remove the word "type" unless it is being used to distinguish amongst a class.
    • Resolution:
      Hide

      The specification and schema follow the NIEM Naming and Design Rules. The resolution is to add a non-normative reference to the NIEM rules and a section that describes their application to Energy Interoperation.

      Show
      The specification and schema follow the NIEM Naming and Design Rules. The resolution is to add a non-normative reference to the NIEM rules and a section that describes their application to Energy Interoperation.

      Description

      Ei Enroll - In some places the "Type" suffix appears to make sense, e.g. ResourceGenerationType where perhaps a distinction is being made among different types of resources, however, in some places it is somewhat confusing e.g. ResourceTypeType. (Would this indicate where an enum would be used?)

      Is there a naming convention here to distinguish complex types in the schema with the "type" suffix?

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              william.cox William Cox (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              gerald.gray Gerald Gray (Inactive)
            • Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: