Use of "Type" in the naming convention

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: wd22
    • Component/s: schema
    • None
    • Environment:

      Gerald Gray

    • Hide

      Remove the word "type" unless it is being used to distinguish amongst a class.

      Show
      Remove the word "type" unless it is being used to distinguish amongst a class.
    • Hide

      The specification and schema follow the NIEM Naming and Design Rules. The resolution is to add a non-normative reference to the NIEM rules and a section that describes their application to Energy Interoperation.

      Show
      The specification and schema follow the NIEM Naming and Design Rules. The resolution is to add a non-normative reference to the NIEM rules and a section that describes their application to Energy Interoperation.

      Ei Enroll - In some places the "Type" suffix appears to make sense, e.g. ResourceGenerationType where perhaps a distinction is being made among different types of resources, however, in some places it is somewhat confusing e.g. ResourceTypeType. (Would this indicate where an enum would be used?)

      Is there a naming convention here to distinguish complex types in the schema with the "type" suffix?

            Assignee:
            William Cox (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Gerald Gray (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: