-
Type: Sub-task
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority: Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:
Toby Considine
-
Resolution:
ENERGYINTEROP-382 - splitting the near/far question
Per Ed Koch to address simple clients (OpenADR1). Typcally have only an "in the future" and "now".
Is this even needed in EI? Concept may not be needed.
"<xs:documentation>event pending in the far future. The exact definition of how far in the future this refers is dependent upon the DR program, but typically means the next day.</xs:documentation> "
EK: Need pending if not this; different strategies for things you have to do far in advance like pre-cooling. Difference in the strategy you'd apply - "far" means you can do something.