OASIS Energy Interoperation TCIcon indicating the project type

OASIS Energy Interoperation TC

Uploaded image for project: 'OASIS Energy Interoperation TC'
  1. OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
  2. ENERGYINTEROP-473 Resources - Define Resouce and explore its use Collector
  3. ENERGYINTEROP-429

wd23: incorrect glossary entry reference to EMIX

    Details

    • Type: Sub-task
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: wd24
    • Fix Version/s: wd32
    • Component/s: spec
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:

      Anne Hendry

    • Proposal:
      Hide

      Delete lines 1454 - 1456 or use another term (don't define 'resource' twice in a differing ways).

      Show
      Delete lines 1454 - 1456 or use another term (don't define 'resource' twice in a differing ways).
    • Resolution:
      Hide

      Rationalize the definitions of Resource. Make the Glossary consistent with the one selected.

      This is in non-normative Appendix B.

      Show
      Rationalize the definitions of Resource. Make the Glossary consistent with the one selected. This is in non-normative Appendix B.

      Description

      Line 1454 - 1456 states:
      "Resource (as defined in EMIX): A Resource is something that can describe its capabilities in a Tender
      1455 into a market. How those Capabilities vary over time is defined by application of the Capability
      1456 Description to a WS-Calendar Sequence. See [EMIX]."

      EMIX has no such definition for 'Resource'. Rather it has many mentions of various characteristics under various circumstances in many different places in the specification, but no definition.

      Resource is already defined for Energy Interop. It doesn't make sense to have two definitions in one spec for the same term, one from the spec itself and then another differing one from different spec. Otherwise you'd need to specify each time you used the term which one you were using.

        Attachments

          Activity

          Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
          Hide
          Permalink
          william.cox William Cox (Inactive) added a comment -

          May be post PR02.

          Show
          william.cox William Cox (Inactive) added a comment - May be post PR02.
          Hide
          Permalink
          toby.considine Toby Considine (Inactive) added a comment -

          This is one of the more critical issues in the current Spec. DIfferent partie want to define Resources for Radically different purposes w/o taking the trouble to define a consensus view. Accordinngly, we have a muddle here that could substantially limit interoperation between implimentations,

          Deferring this for discussion during the PR and at the F2F in Montreal

          Show
          toby.considine Toby Considine (Inactive) added a comment - This is one of the more critical issues in the current Spec. DIfferent partie want to define Resources for Radically different purposes w/o taking the trouble to define a consensus view. Accordinngly, we have a muddle here that could substantially limit interoperation between implimentations, Deferring this for discussion during the PR and at the F2F in Montreal
          Hide
          Permalink
          toby.considine Toby Considine (Inactive) added a comment -

          You have to Close to Re-open to Defer

          Show
          toby.considine Toby Considine (Inactive) added a comment - You have to Close to Re-open to Defer
          Hide
          Permalink
          toby.considine Toby Considine (Inactive) added a comment -

          Opening all Deferred Items following fote out of WD25 as a CSD for PR

          Show
          toby.considine Toby Considine (Inactive) added a comment - Opening all Deferred Items following fote out of WD25 as a CSD for PR
          Hide
          Permalink
          toby.considine Toby Considine (Inactive) added a comment -

          Current resolution uses new EMIX Glossary, makes stronger references ot EMIX spec.

          Ann, does this now answer your concerns?

          Show
          toby.considine Toby Considine (Inactive) added a comment - Current resolution uses new EMIX Glossary, makes stronger references ot EMIX spec. Ann, does this now answer your concerns?
          Hide
          Permalink
          toby.considine Toby Considine (Inactive) added a comment -

          Moved to closed per unanimous vote (Aaron no longer present) in TC Meeting 2011-11-09

          Show
          toby.considine Toby Considine (Inactive) added a comment - Moved to closed per unanimous vote (Aaron no longer present) in TC Meeting 2011-11-09

            People

            • Assignee:
              toby.considine Toby Considine (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              ahendry Anne Hendry (Inactive)
            • Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: