Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Minor
    • Resolution: No Action
    • Affects Version/s: wd28
    • Fix Version/s: wd29
    • Component/s: schema
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:

      Toby Considine

    • Resolution:
      Hide

      Closing no action, can be done by extension of Streams and Report Type

      Show
      Closing no action, can be done by extension of Streams and Report Type

      Description

      The submitted notes on including Reading Type suggest non-power, non-energy readings be exchanged: Quality. Energy Interoepration does not currentyl support Quality feedback as part of Energy Interoperationn.

      There should be a signal type to transmist quality readings Quality is an Emix Type, it can appear per Interval, so mechanically its OK. Quality has a number of measures that are different than the tope level service request. THis can consist of sending an "empty" quality warrant down with a reporting expectation. THe Feedback is then a completed Q Warrant, with the appropriate Intervals. per request, to segment the response.

      Does this mean we need to have a service to enable a buyer (or VEN) to say "wait a mniute, you've been giving me lousy power!" and return a Quantity feedback w/o request?

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              william.cox William Cox (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              toby.considine Toby Considine (Inactive)
            • Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: