640 - Interactions - is it important or worthwhile to note that interactions are always in a context, and if so, should we say that the parties play different roles in a given context?

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major
    • wd15
    • Affects Version/s: wd12
    • Component/s: spec
    • None
    • Environment:

      SGIP-PAP09 Ed Koch

    • Hide

      Re-write of Chapter two addressed this

      Show
      Re-write of Chapter two addressed this

      See Party B, and Party C are playing different roles in two different interactions. I look and say presumably, in two different contexts--say two different programs or tariffs. Not necessarily playing dual roles in a single context. Need email thread to discuss.

            Assignee:
            Toby Considine (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Toby Considine (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: