Minor Much has changed since wd27, much in response to your comment. I'm responding with respect to wd32.
Editorial
lines 657 & 662 - [WS-Calendar] itself extends the well-known semantics [RFC5545]. Sentence is repeated.
line 666 - "EMIX does not redefine these terms", maybe EI or "EI and EMIX"?
ABOVE IS CLEANED UP IN wd32.
Comments:
5.3.3 Response Smoothing.
977- How is tolerence used? I see it in the text and schemas, but what is it telling me? Is it the the range of acceptable random start?
ADDRESSED IN NEW SECTION 4.1.4 in wd32, lines 721-757
980- eiSmoothing is derived from EMIX base, but I do not see where/how this would be called out in an Event message.
Smoothing has 3 enumerations without definitions. How are they used? I am surmising that these indicate the type of pseudorandom number generation algorithm to use. If this is the case, there are probably a lot more than 3 (in both uniform and non-uniform). In the case of poisson it may need the value of lambda as a parameter. Maybe just a string for a name and a way to pass parameters and leave the rest to the implementers.
NOTES:
eiSmoothing (of EiSmoothingType is not (wd32) derived from EMIX base; the enumerated values are defined in section 5.2.3 line 987 wd32.
Poisson has been deleted; additional parameters are not defined.
The text is much more clear thanks to these pointed comments.