• Hide

      Added footnote "Some specifications (e.g. [FSGIM]) have extended the basic [Streams] capabilities, but this brings additional complexity which does not benefit our use cases."

      Show
      Added footnote "Some specifications (e.g. [FSGIM] ) have extended the basic [Streams] capabilities, but this brings additional complexity which does not benefit our use cases."

      Sections 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 (beginning at line 158) discuss conformance with WS-Calendar Streams and with FSGIM. It should be noted that FSGIM extended the idea of Streams beyond just a sequence of identical, contiguous intervals (as documented in the FSGIM User Guide, beginning at page 221). I would recommend that the CTS committee consider this more general specification, which supports the notion of Streams as well as other, less periodic sequences.

      Steve Ray

            Assignee:
            williamcox
            Reporter:
            Toby Considine (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: