Agreed. Editor's working "notes to self" got included in release, which explains odd-tone and language.
Paragraphs were deleted and section was re-written to focus solely, as indicated in title, use of Party and CounterParty in Tender and Transaction messages
Agreed. Editor's working "notes to self" got included in release, which explains odd-tone and language.
Paragraphs were deleted and section was re-written to focus solely, as indicated in title, use of Party and CounterParty in Tender and Transaction messages
Description
page 18 line 304
These questions seem out of character to include in a standard.