Description of permitted clientIds confusing (review comment from Nicholas Humfrey)

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: 3.1.1
    • Component/s: core
    • None

      Public review comment received from Nicholas Humfrey (point 7)

      7) The wording around the characters allowed in client ids (section
      3.1.3.1) is slightly confusing - particularly as the 'MAY' clause is
      likely to lead to incompatible implementations. I would like to see '-'
      appearing in the list of required characters - as RFC952 specifies for
      host names.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Richard Coppen (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: