Support for Bindings is optional in specification narrative, but seems always required for Servers.

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major
    • OBIX 1.1 WD27
    • Affects Version/s: OBIX 1.1 PR02
    • Component/s: OBIX 1.1 Specification
    • None
    • Environment:

      TAB Review

    • Hide

      Make the two sections consistent - plan pending TC input is to change 5.4.3 to MUST

      Show
      Make the two sections consistent - plan pending TC input is to change 5.4.3 to MUST

      "In 5.4.3 Bindings:
      ""Servers SHOULD include the available bindings supported in the bindings Lobby Object. ""
      Then the conformance clause says:
      ""6. The Lobby MUST provide a list of the bindings supported.""
      Although technically it is OK for a conformance clause to strengthen a normative statement from the specification body, it is unclear why the Bindings section from the start does not make the mandatory requirement itself. There does not seem to be another way to conform for Servers, that needs that optionality."

            Assignee:
            Toby Considine (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Toby Considine (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: