Need to indicate that all simple types are XSD types in Figure 4-1

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major
    • OBIX 1.1 WD44
    • Affects Version/s: OBIX 1.1 WD43
    • Component/s: OBIX 1.1 Specification
    • None
    • Environment:

      William Cox

    • Hide

      Add a new paragraph after 319 as follows:

      Diagram Notes: All types are as defined in [XML Schema]. obix:Nil is the empty Contract List included in stdlib.obix (see section XXXX)

      Add reference to stdlib.obix as appropriate.

      Show
      Add a new paragraph after 319 as follows: Diagram Notes: All types are as defined in [XML Schema] . obix:Nil is the empty Contract List included in stdlib.obix (see section XXXX) Add reference to stdlib.obix as appropriate.
    • Hide

      Add a new paragraph after 319 as follows:

      Diagram Notes: All types are as defined in [XML Schema]. obix:Nil is the empty Contract List included in stdlib.obix (see section XXXX)

      Add reference to stdlib.obix as appropriate.

      Show
      Add a new paragraph after 319 as follows: Diagram Notes: All types are as defined in [XML Schema] . obix:Nil is the empty Contract List included in stdlib.obix (see section XXXX) Add reference to stdlib.obix as appropriate.

      On lines 311-319 it is not clear that the types are XSD types. This is especially confusing because the UML simple type is "integer" with no implied range; the schema consistently uses "long" which is an XSD type that fits in 64 bits.

      [Note that xs:integer is the supertype of xs:long without value restruction[

            Assignee:
            Craig Gemmill (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            William Cox (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: