has operator is missing from the operator precedence table

    • Type: Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major
    • V4.0_CSD03
    • Affects Version/s: V4.0_CS01
    • Component/s: URL Conventions
    • None
    • Environment:

      [Applied]

      Section 5.1.1.9 defines operator precedence but doesn't mention the new "has" operator that can be used to determine if an enumeration value contains a particular member.

      Enums only support equality and comparison operators, so it probably doesn't make a lot of difference.

      If we add it to Primary then::

      Not style has Sales.Pattern'Yellow'

      would be interpreted the same as::

      Not (style has Sales.Pattern'Yellow')

            Assignee:
            handl
            Reporter:
            Michael Pizzo (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: