-
Type:
Improvement
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: V4.0_CSD01
-
Fix Version/s: V4.0_CSD02
-
Component/s: Data Aggregation
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:
[Proposed][Applied]
-
Proposal:
-
Resolution:
The current aggregation specification use the old path syntax for nested expands. This is inconsistent with the new way to represent expands in core. Can we figure out a syntax for nested expands in aggregation that is consistent with core?