Aggregation: Can we find a better way to represent nested expands?

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major
    • V4.0_CSD02
    • Affects Version/s: V4.0_CSD01
    • Component/s: Data Aggregation
    • None
    • Environment:

      [Proposed][Applied]

      The current aggregation specification use the old path syntax for nested expands. This is inconsistent with the new way to represent expands in core. Can we figure out a syntax for nested expands in aggregation that is consistent with core?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Michael Pizzo (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: