-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Applied
-
Priority:
Minor
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: ODF 1.2
-
Component/s: Schema and Datatypes, Text
-
Labels:None
-
Proposal:
Replace text in 4.4.1
"The <text:section> element represents a named region of paragraph-level text content. Sections start and end on <text:h> or <text
> boundaries and can contain any number of those elements."
by
"The <text:section> element represents a named region of a certain content of the document."Replace text in 4.4.1 "The <text:section> element represents a named region of paragraph-level text content. Sections start and end on <text:h> or <text > boundaries and can contain any number of those elements." by "The <text:section> element represents a named region of a certain content of the document." -
Resolution:
Copied from office-comment list
Original author: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>
Original date: 27 Apr 2009 13:01:42 -0000
Original URL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200904/msg00050.html
4.4.1:
----b
The <text:section> element represents a named region of paragraph-level
text content. Sections start and end on <text:h> or <text> boundaries
and can contain any number of those elements.
----e
What is mean by "start and end on <text:h> or <text> boundaries"?
According to the schema it seems sections can be used in documents that
contain neither <text:h> or <text> elements (but which might contain
just tables and lists). Would such documents then be non-conformant?
Oliver,
Err, does this mean that the <text:section> element can overlap other XML elements? Or do you want to remove the implied limitation that sections begin/end on <text> and <text:h> boundaries? That they can begin/end on other boundaries?
Patrick,
my answers are: No. Yes. Yes.
E.g., the following is possible:
<text:table>...<\text:table>
<text:section>
<text:table>...<\text:table>
<text:h>...<\text.h>
<text>...<\text.p>
<text:list>...<\text.list>
<\text:section>
<text:list>...<\text:list>
Correction will appear in OpenDocument-v1.2-part-1-cd03-rev05.
The actual text seems to be outdated and does not fit to the schema.