-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Applied
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: ODF 1.0
-
Fix Version/s: ODF 1.0 Errata 02
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Proposal:
-
Resolution:
Replace:
"The manner in which the language is represented is similar to the language tag described in [RFC3066]. It consists of a two or three letter Language Code taken from the ISO 639 standard optionally followed by a hyphen
and a two-letter Country Code taken from the ISO 3166 standard."
with:
"The syntax and semantics of the language tag are specified in [RFC3066]."Replace: "The manner in which the language is represented is similar to the language tag described in [RFC3066] . It consists of a two or three letter Language Code taken from the ISO 639 standard optionally followed by a hyphen and a two-letter Country Code taken from the ISO 3166 standard." with: "The syntax and semantics of the language tag are specified in [RFC3066] ."
Transcribed from http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1078.htm
Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-1
QUALIFIER clarification required
REFERENCES IN DOCUMENT Clause 3.1.15
NATURE OF DEFECT The second sentence in the second paragraph in this clause does not allow optional subtags, while such subtags are allowed in the referenced document, namely RFC 3066. Does ODF intentionally disallow subtags?
SOLUTION PROPOSED BY THE SUBMITTER Just reference to RFC 3066 and stop there. Do not say anything about what is normatively specified in RFC 3066.