text:continue-numbering (text:numbered-paragraph)

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major
    • ODF 1.2
    • Affects Version/s: ODF 1.2
    • Component/s: Lists
    • None
    • Environment:

      ODF 1.2 cd02

    • Hide

      can we deprecate, or better, remove the text:continue-numbering
      attribute on text:numbered-paragraph in ODF 1.2?

      Show
      can we deprecate, or better, remove the text:continue-numbering attribute on text:numbered-paragraph in ODF 1.2?
    • Hide

      Deprecated. Corrected to:

      The use of the text:continue-numbering attribute with the <text:numbered-paragraph> element has been deprecated. (at end of section on this attribute, deprecated header removed)

      Show
      Deprecated. Corrected to: The use of the text:continue-numbering attribute with the <text:numbered-paragraph> element has been deprecated. (at end of section on this attribute, deprecated header removed)

      found this in an old mail of mine, and it seems there is no issue for it:

      18.1137 text:continue-numbering

      i have a more substantial problem with this attribute. using it on
      text:list is all well and good, but why is it applicable to
      text:numbered-paragraph?

      in ODF 1.2, text:numbered-paragraph has a mandatory attribute
      text:list-id. all numbered-paragraphs with the same list-id belong to
      the same list. it is necessary to use an attribute, because the
      numbered-paragraphs of a list may be interspersed with other elements.
      if a list represented as a text:list would be interspersed in this way,
      we would have several text:list elements with continue-list attributes
      and (maybe) continue-numbering.
      but numbered-paragraphs have list-id, and thus continue-numbering is
      completely redundant.

      [from:]
      http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200810/msg00132.html

            Assignee:
            Patrick Durusau
            Reporter:
            Michael Stahl (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: